If you’re building with LLMs in 2026, the hard part is no longer “Which model should we use?”
It’s everything around the model.
Latency spikes. Provider outages. Surprise bills. Inconsistent behavior across environments. Teams accidentally shipping GPT-4 where GPT-4o-mini would’ve been fine. Debugging failures across three vendors with five different dashboards.
That’s where LLM gateways start becoming core infrastructure.
This article breaks down the Top 5 LLM gateways used in production today, based on real-world engineering concerns: performance, reliability, governance, cost control, and operational sanity.
We’ll start with a high-level comparison table, then go deeper into how and why these gateways behave differently at scale.
If you’re searching for the best LLM gateway for production workloads, whether open-source, managed, or enterprise, this comparison is designed to help you choose with confidence.
What Is an LLM Gateway (And Why It Matters in Production)
An LLM gateway sits between your application and one or more model providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Bedrock, Gemini, etc.).
Instead of hardcoding provider logic everywhere, the gateway gives you:
- A single API (often OpenAI-compatible)
- Automatic failover when providers degrade
- Routing across models based on latency, cost, or policy
- Centralized observability (latency, tokens, errors, spend)
- Governance controls like budgets, rate limits, and access scopes
At a small scale, you can live without one.
At production scale, not having a gateway usually means:
- Shipping outages you didn’t cause
- Paying for models you didn’t mean to use
- Debugging blind when things go wrong
How We Evaluated These LLM Gateways
This comparison focuses on production readiness, not feature checklists.
Key criteria:
- Performance under sustained load
- Failover and reliability
- Governance and cost controls
- Observability depth
- Ease of integration
- Architectural fit for scale
Quick Comparison: Top 5 LLM Gateways
| Gateway | Runtime | Open Source | Strengths | Tradeoffs | Pricing Model | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bifrost | Go | ✓ | Ultra-low latency, strong governance, built for scale | Fewer niche providers than LiteLLM | Free (self-hosted) | High-traffic production systems |
| Cloudflare AI Gateway | Edge (CF) | ✗ | Tight Cloudflare integration, caching | Cloudflare lock-in | Free core features + pay-as-you-grow Workers costs | Teams already on Cloudflare |
| LiteLLM | Python | ✓ | Huge provider coverage, flexible routing | Can degrade under sustained high concurrency | Free (self-hosted); Cloud offering pricing varies | Prototyping, Python-first teams |
| Vercel AI Gateway | Managed | ✗ | DX, frontend integration | Limited infra control | Free tier available; paid Pro/Enterprise for usage | Frontend-heavy apps |
| Kong AI Gateway | Go / Lua | ✗ | Enterprise API governance | Heavy setup | Enterprise pricing (typically starting ~$500/mo+) | Existing Kong users |
While these gateways may look similar at a glance, their behavior under real production traffic varies significantly once latency, reliability, and governance enter the picture.
1. Bifrost (by Maxim AI)
Bifrost starts from a very different assumption than most LLM gateways.
It assumes the gateway will be:
- Long-lived
- Shared across teams
- On the critical path of production traffic
- Measured in thousands of requests per second, not dozens
Written in Go, Bifrost is a high-performance, open-source LLM gateway designed as infrastructure from day one. It exposes a single OpenAI-compatible API with comprehensive documentation while supporting more than 15 major providers, including OpenAI, Anthropic, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex, Mistral, Groq, Ollama, and others.
What really separates Bifrost is that governance, observability, and reliability are not add-ons. They are core primitives.
Why Bifrost Is ~50× Faster Than LiteLLM (And Why That Matters)
Under sustained real-world traffic at 5,000 requests per second, Bifrost adds roughly 11 microseconds of gateway overhead.
Python-based gateways like LiteLLM typically add hundreds of microseconds, sometimes milliseconds, once concurrency climbs. At scale, that difference compounds fast, especially in agent workflows where a single user action can trigger multiple LLM calls.
This isn’t about the “Go vs Python” ideology. It’s about predictable latency, memory stability, and concurrency under pressure.
Built-In Infrastructure Features
Bifrost includes:
- Automatic failover and health-aware routing
- Adaptive load balancing
- Semantic caching
- Per-tenant budgets and rate limits
- Virtual keys for scoped access
- Built-in observability with a real-time UI
- OpenTelemetry and Prometheus support
- MCP gateway support
These features are always on, not plugins you bolt on later.
Pricing:
Bifrost is fully open-source (Apache 2.0) and free to self-host on your infrastructure. There’s no gateway cost, you only pay for the underlying compute you use and the model providers your traffic routes through. This makes Bifrost especially cost-predictable for teams scaling AI workloads without vendor lock-in.
Best for:
Teams running high-traffic, customer-facing AI systems where latency, cost control, and reliability actually matter.
2. Cloudflare AI Gateway
Cloudflare AI Gateway extends Cloudflare’s edge platform into the AI layer.
It provides a unified interface to multiple LLM providers, along with caching, retries, rate limiting, and analytics; all tightly integrated into Cloudflare’s global network.
If you’re already running Workers, WAF, and CDN on Cloudflare, this can be an attractive option. AI traffic becomes just another first-class workload at the edge.
The tradeoff is flexibility. You’re buying into Cloudflare’s ecosystem and operating model.
Pricing:
Cloudflare AI Gateway includes free core gateway features, and you can start without paying an upfront fee, including dashboard, caching, and basic routing. However, as usage grows, you may incur Cloudflare Workers usage costs (e.g., CPU time and request counts) and potentially log storage limits if you need long-term retention or high log volumes.
Best for:
Teams deeply invested in Cloudflare who want AI traffic managed alongside edge infrastructure.
3. LiteLLM
LiteLLM is a Python-first gateway, and it’s one of the most widely adopted open-source LLM gateways.
Its biggest strength is coverage: 100+ providers, all normalized behind an OpenAI-compatible API. For Python teams, the setup feels natural and flexible.
LiteLLM shines when:
- You’re experimenting with many providers
- Traffic is moderate
- Flexibility matters more than predictability
At higher concurrency, however, Python’s runtime characteristics start to show. Memory usage grows, tail latency spikes, and sustained load becomes harder to manage without careful tuning.
Pricing:
LiteLLM is open-source and free to self-host, meaning there’s no gateway price apart from your own infrastructure costs and the model provider charges you incur. If you use LiteLLM’s cloud or managed services, those offerings may include their own usage tiers and fees, but the core gateway itself has no required licensing cost when self-hosted.
Best for:
- Prototyping
- Internal tools
- Python-first stacks with moderate traffic
4. Vercel AI Gateway
Vercel AI Gateway is designed for teams building user-facing AI features with modern web frameworks. Optimized for Developer Experience.
It offers:
- OpenAI-compatible APIs
- Automatic failover
- Per-model analytics
- Tight integration with Vercel’s AI SDK and Next.js
The focus here is speed of iteration, not deep infrastructure control. You trade configurability for simplicity.
Pricing:
Vercel AI Gateway provides a free tier to get started, and its pricing model does not add markup on token usage. You can use Vercel’s AI Gateway with Bring Your Own Keys (BYOK) with transparent pricing, you pay for tokens at the same rates as the model providers, and Vercel doesn’t charge extra per token. For larger teams and enterprise needs, Pro and Enterprise plans are available with custom pricing based on usage and support requirements.
Best for:
Frontend-heavy teams shipping AI features quickly on Vercel.
5. Kong AI Gateway
Kong AI Gateway extends Kong’s API management platform to LLM traffic.
If you already run Kong, this is a natural extension: same plugins, same governance model, same security posture, now applied to AI workloads.
It’s powerful, but not lightweight. Setup and customization assume familiarity with Kong’s ecosystem.
Pricing:
Kong AI Gateway is part of Kong’s API management ecosystem, and pricing is typically tied to Kong Konnect or Kong Enterprise plans rather than a standalone free tier. Enterprise plans often start at several hundreds of dollars per month for control planes and add-ons for plugin features, with additional costs possible depending on API traffic, plugins, and enterprise usage.
Best for:
Enterprises already standardized on Kong.
How to Choose the Right LLM Gateway
Ask yourself:
- How much traffic will this handle in six months?
What works at 100 RPS can quietly fall apart at 1,000+ RPS. Plan for where usage is going, not where it is today.
- Do I need per-team or per-customer budgets?
The moment multiple teams or tenants share the same gateway, cost attribution and enforcement stop being optional.
- How painful would an outage be?
If AI is on your critical path, provider downtime becomes a product issue, not just an infra inconvenience.
- Do I want flexibility or predictability?
Some gateways optimize for experimentation; others optimize for stable, repeatable behavior under load. Few do both well.
Many gateways work early on. Far fewer still make sense once scale, reliability, and cost actually matter.
Final Thoughts
LLM gateways are no longer optional glue code.
They’re becoming infrastructure, and infrastructure choices tend to stay with you longer than models.
If you’re optimizing for experimentation, LiteLLM is a good choice.
If you’re embedded in a specific platform, Cloudflare or Vercel make sense.
If you’re already an enterprise API shop, Kong fits naturally.
But if you’re building high-traffic production AI systems and want performance, governance, and reliability treated as first-class concerns, Bifrost is hard to beat because its architectural choices hold up under real load.
| Thanks for reading! 🙏🏻 I hope you found this useful ✅ Please react and follow for more 😍 Made with 💙 by Hadil Ben Abdallah |
  
|
|---|
