This article outlines common mistakes in applying GD&T and datum features that can frustrate machinists, confuse quality inspectors, and hinder CMM programmers. Recognizing these issues early can enhance communication, streamline inspection, and lead to better parts.
Misused & Misunderstood: Common GD&T and Datum Pitfalls on Engineering Prints
Related Posts
Advances in Automated NDT: Viable Inspection Solutions for Aerospace Applications
Aerospace components, varying in shape, size, and material, require specialized inspection methods to ensure quality and safety due…
Unusual Metrology: Revealing Less Common Measuring Instruments
We reveal some of the less common measuring instruments.
Portable Hardness Test Methods and When to Use Them
Hardness testing, which began in the 1700s with Mohs’ scratch test for minerals, evolved significantly by the early…